In total, we should not determine this crutial decision to the society just only by one's personal morality matter, but approach this with holistic views. Given the situations surrounding the theory, the death penalty would say remain as it is.
Topic:Should the death penalty be banned in japan?
A topic like the ban of death penalty often cited in wideshows or newspapers and sparks both advocates
and opponents serious discussion. But when considering the realistic issues, some aspects obstruct the
realisation of ban of the law. And I personaly support the exstence of death penalty for maintaining the social peace.

Firstly, the law's severity contributes to the restriction of criminals. Its power would saw the seed of fear to people who
are seeking chances to commit a crime, and to some extent it deter the crime rate. Furthermore, in terms of the recrime
rate of the criminals after released from the jail, it is surely a better way to confine heinous people to secluded place until
they sentenced rather than give them opportunity to go back to the society and rechallenge towards their moralities.
Secondly, the costs of supporting a great numbers of their lives oppress the government's financial situation. If the death
penalty has diminished, this budget will bloat and get the shackle of the budget's effective distribution .
Firnally, current legislation custom that the liberal democratic party propose an act, the opposition parties take opposite
stance tells us this extreme act realisation seems impossible.