I was going to do sooner or later, and to receive the question "When does securable
become at time that Boulez makes it (Enlightenment of the lecture etc. … This word is
appropriate or apart from) a character?" in the sentiment mixing as a very existing
problem. Thank you.

Boulez..Japan..Boulez..music..speech..situation..have..dissatisfied..chiefly..at
least..in general..wide..circulate..one..for..a little..pedantically..level..
discussion..a lot..score..substantial..content..depress..one..hardly..provide..
thing..understand.

Certainly, a theoretical description is hardly seen in Boulez's writing since a
certain time. This is personally one of the big dissatisfaction though three works
that use the live electronics cannot buy even the score. Peel..after this..say..
almost all..for instance..include.

However, if the memory is correct (Though it is not because of looking at me
and having heard it), Boulez thinks that it had gone occasionally in the
lecture concerning making by oneself since the '70 age. When will obtaining
time become unnecessary (Except whether to have a mind to do) though he makes
it a character?

On the other hand..nowadays..Japan..Boulez..relate..remark..quality..low..one..hold..
problem..fact..deliberate..examination..lack..score..analysis..know..level..Japanese..
reference..Boulez..writing..material..hit..thing..originate..think..writer..
responsibility..think.

I feel either by finding an appropriate explanation for general even of the side
that can talk when correlating with other arts about the music of the 20th century
including Boulez or should talk the situation nowadays that should be supplemented
for myself because it is rare (He is type that avoids an immediate reference, and
because understanding is not easy alone though there is a Mr. word that Boulez dusts
of course) is indescribably incon